Quast

Parents typically have a love/hate feeling towards their kid's trampoline. They love it because it gets their child away from the XBox and gets him outside and exercising and yes, even enjoying it. So what's to hate? Well we all know that trampolines can be dangerous. And I'm pretty sure that when someone is doing a back flip 10 feet in the air, the last thing he's thinking about is safety. Especially if that someone is a teenager or even a pre-teen. And parents can just feel their stomachs tighten as they watch this activity outside the kitchen window.

That's why there are a few trampoline accessories that qualify as necessities.

The most important of these is the net enclosure. This is like a wall of netting that goes around the trampoline that will keep the back flipping child we talked about earlier from falling those 10 feet onto the hard ground. There are a couple of types of net enclosures available. One type attaches directly to the mat, the other is stands on it's own around the trampoline. It really doesn't matter much which one you get. Just be sure to get one.

If you only want to get one accessory, stop reading now. That's the one to get. But if you really want to be safe there are other trampoline accessories you should take a serious look at.

If your trampoline doesn't have padding on the frame, it should. Many come with padding now, but even then, it doesn't hurt to have an extra layer. Plus if your trampoline is getting old, the padding could be worn down. When was the last time you checked your padding? If it's been a while then it's quite possible that hitting the padded frame isn't much different than hitting the frame itself. Make sure your padding actually still has some softness.

Finally, seriously consider getting a cover. First of all, it's great for keeping things like wet leaves, bird waste, dirt and other things off the mat. Who wants to spend time cleaning up that mess? But a cover also has some safety implications. Wet things on the mat can make it slippery. If your child lands wrong he could go flying (into the net enclosure we hope). Simply keeping the mat clean is another way to take away some of the risk.

As parents, we're always going to worry a bit when we watch our children flying high on a trampoline. But having the right trampoline accessories can help cut down on at least some of that worry.

For more information on the trampoline and mini trampoline, visit http://www.discounttrampoline.net You'll also learn about the many benefits of trampoline exercises for the whole family.

Many men suffer from excessive chest fat which diminishes their masculine appearance and harms their success with women. Many men attempt to get rid of the chest fat by doing chest weight exercises and cardio routines. Some man achieve impressive results. Even if they do not manage to lose their chest fat entirely, they do see an improvement in the way their chest looks.

But other men do not do as well with exercise, or are not satisfied with the results which takes time to manifest and which often do not compose a complete elimination of all the excess chest fat.

What are the options available to these men. How can they lose that stubborn chest fat?

Here are the options:

1. Chest Fat Reduction Surgery - This is a plastic surgery in which chest fat is removed by liposuction and the chest is surgically reshaped to look flatter and firmer. I feel that this is a drastic step to take, but I wanted to give you all the options.

2. Chest Fat Burning Pills - These are natural pills which target the extra fatty tissue in the male chest and burn them. This has become a popular solution as it's affordable, painless and easy to do. Many men have had great results with these pills. If you're not satisfied with the way your chest look, these pills may be for you.

3. Specific diet and exercise programs - It may be that you're not working out as well as you should or that your diet is wrong for you. There are some diet and exercise programs which deal specifically with getting rid of excess chest fat. These programs do cost some money, but some guys swear by them.

I hope that now you see that you have options and will take the necessary steps to start losing that stubborn chest fat and improve your looks.

To read tips and ways on how to totally eliminate your man boobs click here: How To Get Rid Of Your Man Boobs Fast.

John Davenport is a fitness and diet expert. He writes on losing chest fat on a dedicated webpage. Click here: Losing Chest Fat - Unknown Options

Direct to Handset - Land grab for mobile real estate

What if someone not knowing any better, declared current Direct to Mobile TV models too much hassle and rather than deploy DVB-H like Crown Castle Media recently did to bypass licensed cellular, why not just wait for WiFi to sort itself out which its about to anyway? Once its seriously ubiquitous with stringent conditional access (CA), content providers should line up.

For starters, lets agree the mans talking nonsense. WiFid buckle under the phalanx it needs vanquished in any face-off. Crown Castles pioneering Pittsburgh trials over L-spectrum isnt the only one out offering high quality broadcast direct to mobile phones.

BT Livetime and Virgin Broadcasting are preparing European mobile phones for prime time via a DAB (Digital Audio Broadcast) variant on steroids that does TV and has interactive functionality. Other pilots are underway in Berlin and Helsinki. Back home, Qualcomm subsidiary MediaFLO plans to deploy and operate a US wide multi-channel TV and audio programming to 3G phones over spectrum owned by Qualcomm, bypassing existing cellular operators.

Seeing encroachment on what was exclusive cellular real estate, some cellular operators in the USA are finally optimizing their existing 2.5G and 3G networks to enable multi-channel TV without the accompanying DVB-H, DMB T&S, DAB or FLO network operator. However, its clear their efforts lack passionate intent. These are voice folk, forced into uncharted waters and the unhappiness is palpable.

With plates evidently full, should the licensed establishment remain in their allotted seats, deal with each other like gentlemen and not worry about gatecrashers? No, because somethings still amiss. The bum hasnt left the dinner table. The settings been awry since WiFi appallingly waited for these gentlemen to ante up $150B for 3G spectrum before walking into the room uninvited.

Oblivious to intelligent argument WiFi now moves way beyond internet access to stake claim on services it has no right to handle. Abetted by users who should know better, its established serious grass roots preponderance. In other words, we have a situation.

The young Chinese entrepreneur we dismissed earlier for espousing broadcast over WiFi is doing the rounds in Taiwan these days. Instead of investing in expensive IP TV or begging cellular operators into cooperating or slugging it out for spectrum appropriate for DVB-H or DAB or DMB-S or DMB-T, he whispers plans to blanket the country with new generation wide-area WiFi access points. If satellite and cable broadcasters let him into their content libraries, he promises riches from mobile phone users. Aware of Internet related security issues he pledges excellent CA from his website using Open Mobile Alliance (OMA) compliant Digital Rights Management (DRM) on Java applets that would drop into mobile phones. His own massive plans along with leveraged third party WiFi means enabled devices can access his broadcast pretty much from any residential location, coffee shop, hotel or restaurant in the populated areas.

Spooked at the webs easy reputation, broadcasters remain shy although some own extensive Chinese content with no IP related proscriptions. Our indefatigable young friend however corralled a niche content provider to allow him web cast select TV shows only to mobile phones under stringent CA. Tired of cellular companies refusing to pay for content other than through one-sided revenue share agreements designed to wring blood from small ring tone suppliers, the distributor plans revenge.

So, what is one to make of this? Deconstruct any competitive face off and one hits turf as cause. Todays big technology battle is for turf in the mobile handset. Hit hard by events since it overpaid for 3G, the licensed cellular establishment mulls over massive erosion to its property rights, the latest by broadcasters readying to directly address cellular users. As if thats not bad enough, dissed content distributors now plan to bludgeon Telcos with WiFi.

Having ignored content as a revenue source during their reign, the Telcos still dabble instead of seriously deploying and fight the wrong battle every time opportunity beckons or a threat rears its head. Peril does not lie in that they were ignorant when the opportunity arose, after all content became our headache only when the pipes broadened, but in their ongoing refusal to bone up. We see recent instances of large shareholders in the bigger telecos throwing in the towel and sell holdings rather than live through an excrutiating learning curve.

Our young Chinese anti-heros alleged pedigree adds a dash of spice to an otherwise bland warning to Telcos. Rumor has it that hes the scion of the largest piracy outfit in the region. Burning their illegal DVDs on boats anchored outside any territorial waters, they give the word 'pirated' a new relevance. If someone from this background can shore up his act, walk away from the family business and now instead of doing a Napster focus on delivering content under strict CA using the latest technology to bring cable TV type security to the Internet, surely it behooves American and Asian Telcos to at least come to terms with what only constitutes possibly their entire future.

But while the cable guys got their act together on telephony and broadcasters directly access cell phones with media, while young entrepreneurs plot to drop CA applets into new breed mobile phones to enable licensed broadcast, the American and Asian telecom establishment outside of Japan, Korea and Hong Kong has yet to come to terms with even voice over broadband let alone IP TV and TV broadcast directly to hand phones. Obsessed with legacy, they continue riding a Vespa on the eight lane broadband highway.

They do so unforgivably, in the face of success stories that should hearten instead of being ignored. At the behest of their media savvy Chairman, PCCW of Hong Kong ventured into IP TV in late 2003. Today, it is the only success story in their otherwise less than stellar performance. Bundled with Internet access, but not VoIP as that would be asking too much, PCCWs IP TV offering swept the territory overtaking the moribund Cable TV licensee with ease. Today, content providers scramble to sign up PCCW and Rupert Murdochs Star TV recently announced its move from Wharf Cable to PCCW broadband.

Telcos easily forget the world no longer revolves around them. They finally appear to ponder IP TV but battle lines have already moved away from TV set tops and redrawn inside mobile phones. At best middle men between owners of content and the viewers, if the Telcos dont rise to the occasion, technology and regulation no longer prevent others from doing so. The paying consumer doesnt care a fig if he gets to see his football match over WiFi, DVB-H, DMB-T, S, or 3G as long as he views it at the least possible cost with the best possible quality and does not always have to rush home to catch it. The intellectual property owner too is ultimately blas about the mechanics as long as he receives top dollar with full protection to his ownership rights. Maybe losing feudal rights to the mobile phone is what it takes for cellular operators to finally wake up and become the prime enabler between content owners and the mobile viewer.

*******